Software is delivered on tiem and on schedule and in accordance with the requirements of the organisations developing and procuring the software.
Project management is needed because software development is always subject to budget and schedule constraints that ahre set by the organisation developing the software.
The product is intangible
Many software projects are 'one-off' projects.
Risk management is concerned with identifying risks and drawing up plans to minimise their effect on a project.
Software risk management is important because of the inherent uncertainties in software development and these uncertainties stem from loosely defined requirements, requirements changes due to changes in customer needs, difficulties in estimating the time and resources required for software development and differences in individual skills.
So we have to anticipate risks, understand the impact of these risks on the project , the product and the business and take steps to avoid these risks.
There are two dimensions of risk classification
There are various types of risk such as estimation, organizational, people, requirements, technology and tools.
Here are some examples.
Risk analysis is a step that analyze identifed risks and assess their probability and effects.
Likelihood of a risk can be presented from low to high
Effects of the risk can be categorized based on their significance.
Here is an example.
Impossible to recruit a staff with required skills.
- Probability is high : in case every company is hiring.
- Effects are catastrophic : without this staff, we can't proceed the project.
Risk planning is a step that consider each risk and develop a strategy to manage that risk.
These are details included in risk planning.
Risk monitoring is a step that assess each identified risks regularly to decide whether or not it is becoming less or more probable.
Also this step assesses whethere the effects of the risk have changed.
Each key risk should be discussed at management progress meetings.
People are an organisation's most important assets.
This is the most principal rule in managing people.
The tasks of a manager should be essentially people-oriented.
Unless there is some understanding of people, management will be unsuccessful.
Also Poor people management is an important contributor to project failure.
So an important role of a manager is to motivate the people working on a project.
Motivation means organizing the work and the working environment to encourage people to work effectively.
If people are not motivated, they will not be interested in the work they are doing.
They will work slowly, be more likely to make mistakes nad will not contribute to the broader goals of the team or the organization.
Mosivation is a complex issue but it appears that there are different types of motivation based on Basic needs, personal nees, social needs.
Motivation should also take into account different personality types
Most software engineering is a group activity.
The development schedule for most non-trivial software projects is such that they can't be completed by one person working alone.
A good group is cohesive and has a team spirit.
The people involved are motivated by the sucess of the group as well as by their own personal goals.
Group interaction is a key determinant of group performance.
But flexibility in group composition is limited.
So it is important that managers do the best they can with available people.
Then what can we get from group cohesiveness?
Here are advantages of a cohesive group.
A mamanger or team leader's job is to create a cohesive group and organize their group so that they can work together effectively.
This involves creating a group with the right balance of technical skills and personalities and organizing that group so that the members work together effectively.
May not be possible to appoint the ideal people to work on a project.
Group composed of members who share the same motivation can be problematic
There are three types of personality.
An effective group has a balance of all types.
If a particular personality is concentrated, that group can't be said to be a good group.
Small software engineering groups are usually organised informally without a rigid structure.
For large projects, there may be a hierachical structure where different groups are responsible for different sub-projects.
Agile development is always based around an informal group on the principle that formal structure inhibits information exchange.
The group acts as a whole and comes to a consensus on decisions affecting the system.
The group leader serves as the external interface of the group but dose not allocate specific work items.
Rather, work is discussed by the group as a whole and tasks are allocated according to ability and experience.
This approach is successful for groups where all members are experienced and competent.
Good communications are essential for effective group working.
Information must be exchanged on the status of work, design decisions and changes to previous decisions.
Good communications also strengthens group cohesion as it promotes understanding.
Your insights on software project management provide a valuable roadmap for navigating the often intricate development landscape. I found your perspective on SE principles enlightening! For those looking to complement their knowledge, here's an excellent resource on structuring software development teams: https://www.cleveroad.com/blog/software-development-team-structure/.