Two strings are considered close if you can attain one from the other using the following operations:
Operation 1: Swap any two existing characters.
For example, abcde -> aecdb
Operation 2: Transform every occurrence of one existing character into another existing character, and do the same with the other character.
For example, aacabb -> bbcbaa (all a's turn into b's, and all b's turn into a's)
You can use the operations on either string as many times as necessary.
Given two strings, word1 and word2, return true if word1 and word2 are close, and false otherwise.
Example 1:
Input: word1 = "abc", word2 = "bca"
Output: true
Explanation: You can attain word2 from word1 in 2 operations.
Apply Operation 1: "abc" -> "acb"
Apply Operation 1: "acb" -> "bca"
Example 2:
Input: word1 = "a", word2 = "aa"
Output: false
Explanation: It is impossible to attain word2 from word1, or vice versa, in any number of operations.
Example 3:
Input: word1 = "cabbba", word2 = "abbccc"
Output: true
Explanation: You can attain word2 from word1 in 3 operations.
Apply Operation 1: "cabbba" -> "caabbb"
Apply Operation 2: "caabbb" -> "baaccc"
Apply Operation 2: "baaccc" -> "abbccc"
class Solution:
def closeStrings(self, word1: str, word2: str) -> bool:
if set(word1) != set(word2):
return False
return Counter(Counter(word1).values()) == Counter(Counter(word2).values())
153/153 cases passed (127 ms)
Your runtime beats 80.34 % of python3 submissions
Your memory usage beats 98.93 % of python3 submissions (17.4 MB)
Your code is actually quite Pythonic already. However, it does perform the counting operation twice which is not necessary. Here's a slightly optimized version of your solution:
from collections import Counter
class Solution:
def closeStrings(self, word1: str, word2: str) -> bool:
counter1, counter2 = Counter(word1), Counter(word2)
return set(word1) == set(word2) and sorted(counter1.values()) == sorted(counter2.values())
In this optimized version:
word1
and word2
in counter1
and counter2
respectively, so we don't have to create a Counter object twice for each word.This solution is both efficient and Pythonic.