Why is syntax important?
- Foundation for semantic analysis
Why is syntax insufficient?
- syntax encodes the structure of language but doesn't directly address meaning
- syntax alone doesn't "grab" in an action to take in the world
Lexical semantics
- Vector representation that encodes information about the distribution of contexts a word appears in
- Words that appear in similar contexts have similar representations
- We can represent what individual words "mean" as a function of what other words they're related to
- "Grab" = execute GrabbingFunction() -> 코드화해서 의미 전달
- "the cup" = object ID 9AF1948A81CD22 -> representation
semantics
- Lexical semantics is concerned with representing the meaning of words
- Logical semantics is concerned with representing the meaning of sentences
Meaning representaion
- A meaning representation should be unambiugous; each statement in a meaning representation should be have one meaning
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54355/54355ae7056cca09a97c841d713b66ad232a7487" alt=""
First-order logic (FOL)
- We want to representation every sentence as an umambiguous proposition in FOL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0716/b0716213fa8915531ddd15e61d24f1365cfd2815" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a8b/d4a8bf1f97d9c7719e54e86febb29626e796be79" alt=""
- How we map a natural language sentence to FOL is the task of semantic parsing; but we define the FOL relations and entities to be sensitive to what matters in our model
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f615/2f61520517f9753b078aca35b9d26a13dd4584df" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac1b2/ac1b23068bff178e2f829272cb8b63fa53a7707f" alt=""
Relations
- N-art relations hold among FOL terms (constants, variables, functions) -> 더 복잡하게 가능하다.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e904/0e9041bb0f0c95d277ab6591c1f132e64efe5130" alt=""
Event semantics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32855/328557a3110dc940329bc876e738089c1923df70" alt=""
[방법1]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef4be/ef4bed551209c2a5016bbbe887e68d51637921cf" alt=""
[방법2]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d28e/9d28edfcac76e58680ba2999c8be6d00aa23fc5d" alt=""
[방법3]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a54d/9a54d164ada54f60f52f5ea0924658fb5c6c6db6" alt=""
shallow semantics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cf7d/5cf7d1d6c3492184c85374fb80f40eba4f7c1677" alt=""
[뉴스 - twitter ... 에 따라 방법이 다를 수 있다.]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44128/441283d63769c5b25dc7704418d1d85b8725238e" alt=""
Thematic rolse
- Thematic roles capture the semantic commonality among arguments for different ralations
- John broke the window
- The window was broken by John
-> 이 두 문장은 syntax로만 보면 완전히 다른 문장이다.
근데, Thematic role 까지 보면 같은 문장이다.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3c4b/e3c4bad673bded9246285013b5de193f9d641e11" alt=""
=> "창문이 깨졌다" 가 핵심이고 위의 features 을 이용해서 부가적인 정보를 더 붙임
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e110b/e110b2c0e6b5e97d96f6e74546539a0e732367ba" alt=""
- Thematic roles are very useful but difficlt to formally difine AGENT, THEME, etc.
- At the same time, they may be too coarse for som applications
Coarsening : Proto-roles
- 좀 더 '일반적'으로 role을 부여 (피상적 Level)
- Proto-roles = generalize thematic roles
2가지 Data
Propbank
-
Sentences from the Penn Treebank annotated with proto-roles, along with lexical entries for each sense of a verb identifying the specific meaning of each proto-role that verb sense
-
Verb-sepcific argument structures lets us map the commonalities among the different surface forms
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02de7/02de7ba949894fa780175bf0bdd2d07697a01487" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9558d/9558dda0fc9e015acb68a5dd7653469f7f337fc2" alt=""
FrameNet
-
Propbank maps argument structure for individual verb senses
-
FrameNet maps argument structure for frames, which are evoked by a lexical unit
-
"A frame is a data-structure for representing a stereotyped situation" - Minsky 1975
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f12a/4f12a4a5c7108383fd8efdda8375747352f09cef" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de933/de93346dfc176edac7c9f0382d3afb60560070a5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1449f/1449f0e13735ede2add41ea2e89d0fbfdc2b6349" alt=""
Semantic Frame
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/134df/134dff440c4466b131c5e423453652c2ea588c31" alt=""
=> Lexical units 를 이용해서 Destroy 에 Frame 을 씌울 수 있다.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7345/a7345f32896c935f5f0ce03764da5f4a51e62456" alt=""
=> 서로 같은 뜻이지만 문장 구조가 다른 두 문장에 Frame 을 씌워서 같은 문장으로 바라볼 수 있게 된다.
=> 같은 sell 과 bought 가 각 문장에서 같은 것을 의미한게 된다.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5585/f558513ff6cbfabb11a86e8ef4a267b756a18ef1" alt=""