Xavier Initialization, also known as Glorot Initialization, is a strategy for weight initialization in neural networks. It was introduced by Xavier Glorot and Yoshua Bengio to tackle the problem of vanishing and exploding gradients in deep neural networks, particularly those with sigmoid and tanh activation functions. This technique is aimed at maintaining a balanced variance of activations and gradients throughout the network, thus facilitating stable and efficient training.
Initial weight settings in neural networks have a profound impact on the training dynamics and the ultimate performance of the model. Improper initialization can lead to:
Xavier Initialization addresses these issues by aiming to keep the variance of the inputs and outputs of each network layer approximately equal. This approach is rooted in the need to maintain the flow of gradients in a controlled manner across the depth of the network, avoiding the extremes of vanishing and exploding values.
For a layer with incoming connections (fan-in) and outgoing connections (fan-out), Xavier Initialization proposes setting the weights from a distribution with a variance given by:
This variance is derived under the assumption that the activations are linear. For a uniform distribution, the weights are initialized as:
For a normal distribution, the initialization would be:
This approach ensures that the variance remains balanced across layers, a crucial factor when using activation functions like sigmoid or tanh, which are sensitive to input scale.
Xavier Initialization is particularly beneficial for networks using activation functions like sigmoid and tanh, due to their sensitivity to the scale of input distribution. It is widely applied in:
Considering non-linear activation functions, adjustments to the Xavier method have been proposed. For instance, modifying the variance calculation to better align with the specific properties of non-linear functions like tanh or sigmoid can enhance performance.
- Glorot, Xavier, and Yoshua Bengio. "Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks." In Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pp. 249-256. 2010.